DIII-D RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES FORUM FOR THE 2013 EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGN
Review | Direct submission with log-in | Request submission without log-in
For website assistance, please contact the Webmaster | 
| ID | Title | Research Area | Name | Affiliation | 
Time Req'ed  | 
ITPA Joint Exp  | 
ITER IO Urgent Research Task  | 
 
| 60 details | Effective NTM control in low torque plasmas | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | No | No | |
| 73 details | Test optimized TBM error field correction at higher values of beta | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | CRPP-EPFL | Yes | No | No | |
| 74 details | Optimize TBM error field correction against field penetration in low NBI torque H-modes | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | CRPP-EPFL | Yes | No | No | |
| 75 details | Evaluate the potential of correcting more than one mode component of the TBM error field | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | CRPP-EPFL | Yes | No | No | |
| 78 details | 3D magnetics plasma response measurements of n=1 perturbations for RWM analysis & model validation | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Department of Energy | Yes | No | Yes | |
| 79 details | 3D magnetics equilibrium measurements to applied n=3 perturbations | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Department of Energy | Yes | No | Yes | |
| 85 details | Current profile control for stable ITER baseline scenario plasmas | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 91 details | Complete the Development of PCS n=2 Error Field Control Algorithm | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Department of Energy | Yes | No | No | |
| 92 details | H-mode Optimization of n=1&2 Error Field Control Currents | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Department of Energy | Yes | No | No | |
| 96 details | Effect of Error Field Control Currents on Strike Point Splitting | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Department of Energy | No | No | No | |
| 97 details | Time-resolved measurement of plasma response spectrum | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 98 details | Develop feedback-controlled MHD spectroscopy | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 99 details | Understand and control resistive wall mode stability in high-qmin plasmas | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | Yes | No | |
| 100 details | Understand resistive wall mode control physics in low-q95 plasmas | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 102 details | TBM mock-up effects on confinement at high β | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | ITER Organization | Yes | No | Yes | |
| 105 details | Optimization and exploration of the q95<2 scenario in DIII-D | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Consorzio RFX | Yes | No | No | |
| 107 details | Error field detection by application of a "spiraling" error field | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | ORNL | Yes | No | No | |
| 108 details | Disruption avoidance by forced magnetic spin-up of NTMs | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | ORNL | Yes | No | No | |
| 119 details | Impact of fast-ions on the RWM stability boundary | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | Yes | No | |
| 122 details | Bid farewell to locked modes - NTM-locking avoidance by feedback synchronization assisted with ECCD | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 123 details | Bid farewell to locked modes - NTM-locking avoidance by feedback synchronization assisted with ECCD | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | No | No | No | |
| 163 details | Exploration of DEFC in the feedback stabilized plasma in low-q discharges | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 174 details | Exploration of DEFC in the feedback stabilized plasma in low-q discharges | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | No | No | No | |
| 183 details | Measurement of multiple mechanisms in the low-density limit via ellipticity in the compass scan | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 186 details | Optimal Mixing of I & C coils for n=1 EFC | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 187 details | H-mode 3-D field optimization with purely kink-resonant and non-resonant n=1 fields | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 188 details | Extension of proxy error field experiments to H-mode plasmas | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | No | No | No | |
| 198 details | Compare the power threshold for pre-emptive NTM suppression vs Catch and Subdue | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 199 details | Reducing the tearing island detection time | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 200 details | Multiple periods of NTM suppression | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 202 details | Error Field Correction Improvement: Adding BetaN dependence | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 212 details | Island seeding with saw teeth pacing: New method to control tearing modes | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 217 details | PID (proportional integral derivative)control of Error Field | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | Yes | No | No | |
| 231 details | Stabilization of NTMs with ECCD | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | QST | No | Yes | No | |
| 232 details | Bifurcated helical core equilibrium - continued | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | U of Wisconsin | Yes | No | No | |
| 238 details | Direct Measurement of NTV Torque | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 239 details | Continuous Scan of NTV Torque Across Low Rotation Peak | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 240 details | Optimization of Applied Error Field Spectrum for NTV | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | No | No | |
| 242 details | q95 < 2 Tokamak Operation Via Dynamic Error Field Correction | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | No | No | |
| 291 details | Trigger-less onset of NTMs with P_EC and NTV effects on rotation regime | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal | No | No | No | |
| 296 details | Determine dependence of RWM marginal stability on rotation and energetic particles | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 298 details | Soft landing with 2/1 TM in the ITER shape | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | No | No | |
| 309 details | Full 3D Rotation optimization of H mode | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | Yes | Yes | |
| 317 details | Study on sawteeth in the neutral beam (NB) heated plasmas | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Korea National Fusion Research Center | No | No | No | |
| 320 details | RWM excitation in the SSI target by reducing triangularity" | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | No | No | No | |
| 326 details | Understand mechanisms by which ECH influences NTM stablility | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | No | No | |
| 328 details | Error field correction at low rotation | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | No | No | |
| 329 details | Discussion of plasma rotation transient process during OFM/ELM-driven RWM w/wo feedback usin | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | PPPL | No | No | No | |
| 331 details | QH-mode with TBM (dup 330) | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | GA | No | No | No | |
| 338 details | Local correction of the TBM error field | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | No | No | Yes | |
| 339 details | Combined effect of TBM and NTM fields on fast-ion confinement | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | UC, Irvine | No | Yes | No | |
| 340 details | Combined effect of TBM and Sawtooth fields on fast-ion confinement | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | UC, Irvine | No | Yes | No | |
| 354 details | Control of Major Disruptions in DIII-D | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | No | No | No | |
| 361 details | Dither injection for closed-loop system identification of vacuum and plasma response | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Consultant | No | No | No | |
| 364 details | Absolute plasma response null measurement by multiple betaN steps | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Columbia U | No | No | No | |
| 366 details | Up/down Asymmetric EFC | Stability & Disruption Avoidance | Department of Energy | No | No | No |