Print this page | 
 	   
	   | Title | 
	   129: Optimization and Control of ITER-like MGI | 
	   
	   
	   
	   | Name: | John Wesley wesley@fusion.gat.com  | 
	   Affiliation: | General Atomics | 
	   
	   
	   
	   | Research Area: | Disruption Mitigation | 
	   Presentation time:  | 
	    Requested | 
	   
		
		
	   | Co-Author(s):  |  | 
	   ITPA Joint Experiment :  | 
	    Yes | 
	   
	   
	   
	   | Description:  | Evaluate optimization and control of low-quantity high-Z MGI applied in the context of meeting ITER DMS requirements for thermal radiation duration and symmetry followed by control of the current decay rate. Assess with single and two-location fast valves, with pure high-Z (neon or argon) and mixed D2 + high-Z gases. Goals include assessing feasibility of controlling TE radiation duration and symmetry and ensuing current decay, providing data on/for scaling of same with target plasma configuration and plasma size/configuration/energy (basis for comparison of DIII-D attributes with larger/smaller plasma size, etc.) Establish insight for ITER DMS gas delivery and control requirements. Assess variance and degree of repeat controllability. Assess RE seed generation and/or progress to RE plateau. | 
	   ITER IO Urgent Research Task  :  | 
	    Yes | 
	   
	   
	   
	   | Experimental Approach/Plan:  | 1-valve and 2-valve MGI with neon, argon and mixed gases ~ 200 Torr-liter neon input, LSN and vertical stable IWL targets with q ~3, ohmic -> max NBI input. | 
	   | Background:  | ITER proposes low-Q neon MGI as candidate disruption mitigation technique. Thermal energy radiation duration and symmetry must satisfy no-wall-melt requirements. Subsequent rate of current decay must fall within 50-150  ms limits. Feasibility of fulfilling these sequential requirements needs to be assessed in an integrated experiment. Critical issue/requirement for 2016 Final Design Review | 
	   | Resource Requirements:  | MEDUSA and CEREBUS MGI systems, standard NBI and ECH, IWL and LSN equilibrium | 
	   | Diagnostic Requirements:  | Usual disruption diagnostics including multi-azimuth bolometry, 3-D magnetics, periscope and divertor IRTV, fast camera imaging, RE seed diagnostics, during injection TS profiles, | 
	   | Analysis Requirements:  | 3_D plume models, fast EFIT or JFIT reconstructions, NIMROD simulations, .... | 
	   | Other Requirements:  |  |